An identified source
We use published forms and identify their provenance, version, and the time period they ask you to consider.
Our approach
Understand yourself. Know what your result means.
A questionnaire can help put your experiences into words. Our role is to explain what it measures, how it is scored, and what your result can actually tell you.
Free tests and resultsAnswers stay in your browser
THE TOOLS WE OFFER
Different questionnaires. Different starting points.
Not every test answers the same question. Choose a tool to explore the original research, the version offered, and its limitations.
Selected tool
Explore this free testAttention & ADHD
RESEARCH WITH CONTEXT
ASRS v1.1What the science says
Six questions from research on adult ADHD screening, developed with the World Health Organization.
The research
Kessler and colleagues compared questionnaire answers with clinical assessments in 154 adults from a US survey, oversampling people who reported ADHD symptoms.
What the test explores
How often signs related to attention, organization, and hyperactivity occurred over the past six months. It is a screening tool, not a diagnosis.
The version offered
The official six-question short screener, using the French and English forms distributed by NYU. Mind’s reading aids are separate additions.
What to keep in mind. The original study’s results are not your personal probability of having ADHD. Symptom history, including childhood, and daily impact require evaluation with a professional.
Explore the research
- Kessler et al. · 2005 · Psychological MedicineThe World Health Organization adult ADHD self-report scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population — opens in a new tab
- NYU Langone · Forms and terms of useASRS v1.1 — Six-question screener — opens in a new tab
The questionnaire, its translation, and AI are separate questions.
The research cited concerns the instrument and the populations studied. It does not automatically validate every translation, this digital interface, or a future AI-enhanced analysis.
The publications below concern the studied instruments. They do not independently clinically validate the Mind interface.
AN EXPLANATION, NOT A LABEL
What a result can tell you.
We start with a plain-language explanation. The score follows, along with its scale, scoring rule, and a breakdown of your answers.
Read a result alongside your experience: how long difficulties have lasted, their context, and their impact also matter.
Does a high score mean I have a condition?
Not on its own. A screening questionnaire points to signs worth exploring; it does not replace a clinical assessment. Well-being and personality measures do not provide a diagnosis either.
Does a low score mean everything is fine?
It cannot rule out a difficulty. If your experiences concern you or affect daily life, you can speak with a professional regardless of your score.
Why not show a risk percentage?
A score is not your personal probability. Turning a result out of 21 or 100 into a “risk of having a condition” would imply precision the questionnaire does not provide. We do not invent personality percentiles without an appropriate reference population either.
Can I compare scores across tests?
Each instrument has its own scale and direction. A higher WHO-5 score describes higher reported well-being; that is different from GAD-7 or PHQ-9 symptom scores. The 50- and 120-item Big Five forms are distinct and their scores are not interchangeable.
WORDING WITH A SOURCE
Language is part of the method.
A translation can change how someone understands a question. We identify the version offered and distinguish source wording from our explanations.
Separate reading aids
When a term needs explaining, a reading aid is available beside the question. An editorial addition does not become a newly validated translation.
Visible adaptations
Corrections and adaptations are disclosed. A translation is not described as validated simply because it is available online.
Which versions do we use?
ASRS v1.1
French and English six-question forms distributed by NYU. Reading aids are separate from the questionnaire.
See this questionnaire’s sourcesGAD-7 & PHQ-9
Forms distributed by ECFS: French for France (GAD-7), French for Belgium (PHQ-9), and English for the UK. The interface uses US English; the published questions are not retranslated.
See this questionnaire’s sourcesPHQ-9 sourcesCopenhagen Burnout Inventory
SFMU French and NFA English forms. The six recipient-related questions are contextualized for the people someone works with: clients, students, service users, patients, and others. This adaptation is disclosed, not presented as a new validation.
See this questionnaire’s sourcesWHO-5
The 2024 WHO English form and the 1999 French translation redistributed by WHO. Redistribution does not mean WHO guarantees the translation’s accuracy.
See this questionnaire’s sourcesBig Five · 50 and 120
50-item form: Gibson/Boucher translation with documented corrections. 120-item form: Johnson’s selected items from the Thiry/Piolti European French adaptation. We do not claim independent psychometric validation of these French forms.
See this questionnaire’s sourcesYOUR ANSWERS BELONG TO YOU
Understanding yourself should not require sharing everything.
Current test answers and results are calculated in your browser. They are not sent to our servers or used to train AI. Leaving, reloading, or changing language clears them.
Read our Privacy PolicyYour basic result stays free
It is visible without an account, email, or payment. Any future AI-enhanced analysis would be a separate paid option.
You can review and edit
Before your result, a review lets you check your choices. Afterward, you can explore your answers and understand their scores.
An honest presentation
The short animation prepares the display; it does not simulate a doctor’s opinion or an AI analyzing your answers. Current scoring follows questionnaire rules.
A starting point. At your own pace.
Choose what you would like to explore. The test and its basic result are free.
Updated October 24, 2026Report an error or unclear wording